Department for Education

Launch of The Skills Toolkit

baroness berridge: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Education (Gavin Williamson) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.Today I am launching “The Skills Toolkit” – a new online platform giving people access to free, top-quality digital and numeracy courses to help build up their skills, progress in work and boost their job prospects. The new platform enables anyone who would like to use it to grow these essential skills while they are staying at home to protect the NHS and save lives. The Skills Toolkit is a first step towards longer-term recovery, helping everyone start to build up the key skills we need.Education and skills are key to opening up opportunities, no matter your background. The Skills Toolkit allows people to access free digital and numeracy training from some of our most prestigious learning institutions, including the Open University and the Institute for Coding. These are skills that everyone needs to thrive in the 21st Century and ones that evidence suggests are increasingly in demand across almost all sectors and occupations. Our approach to designing and delivering The Skills Toolkit has been informed by experts in online learning and the courses available on the platform have been carefully selected following conversations with businesses and may be expanded at a later date.The Skills Toolkit meets a range of needs and is open to everyone – irrespective of age, employment status or current skill level. From a bitesized course to improve your Powerpoint skills to digital marketing and coding. The courses available support both furloughed workers who want to learn new skills and those who are currently out of work and looking to quickly build up their CV with valuable skills for a new job. Equally, the learning is there for anyone else who is keen to challenge themselves or keep their mind healthy and busy during time spent at home.The Skills Toolkit offers employers – who are also facing unprecedented challenges – a positive offer to support and develop furloughed employees who are interested in learning from home.We know the current situation has made home life extremely difficult for many people, and I realise that learning of any type – online or otherwise – may be far from the minds of some people at this point in time. For people who can find the time, however, learning is known to benefit mental health and wellbeing, improving self-esteem, and giving an improved sense of purpose and control. The flexible nature of the offer, which includes short, online courses that can be completed at any pace or time of the day, means that there is something available for everyone when the right time comes. I am hoping that giving the nation a taster of flexible, online learning will help drive a step-change in the way in which we all develop our skills throughout our working lives.I want to thank all of those training providers who have made these free courses so widely available to the public. It is wonderful to see a fantastic range of organisations including firms and not-for-profit providers contributing to this effort.The Skills Toolkit is available from today on Gov.uk. I urge all members to use it and to recommend it to their constituents and to local employers so that they can encourage their furloughed workers to grab the opportunity to build skills and discover new talents.”  


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS207

Department of Health and Social Care

The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations (Amendments) 2020

lord bethell: My Rt Hon Friend the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (Matt Hancock) has made the following written statement:On 26 March 2020, the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020 came into force, detailing Regulations on social distancing and business and venues closures. These Regulations set out that a review of these Regulations must take place every 21 days to ensure they are both necessary and proportionate. The Government completed the first review as required on 16 April 2020.In this review it was agreed that no change would be made to the existing restrictions and that they would remain in place for at least three more weeks. Recognising the potential for harm to public health and the economy if measures were relaxed too soon, it was agreed that five conditions would need to be met before the measures are eased. These conditions are: 1) Evidence that NHS critical care capacity across the UK will not be breached; 2) there is a sustained and consistent fall in the daily death rate; 3) infection rates decrease to an acceptable level; 4) supplies of PPE and testing meets future demand; and 5) clear evidence that changes won’t risk a second peak in the virus.However, a small number of minor amendments are required to clarify the Regulations and ease the operation of the Regulations. They relate to enforcement of the measures, and businesses and venues affected.Publicly available Government guidance on Gov.uk is being updated to ensure it fully corresponds with the amended Regulations. These are strict measures, but they are measures that we must take in order to protect our NHS and to save lives.


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS206

Delay in the Government's Response to the Paterson Inquiry

lord bethell: My Hon Friend the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Minister for Patient Safety, Suicide Prevention and Mental Health) (Nadine Dorries) has made the following written statement:The report of the Independent Inquiry into the issues raised by the former breast surgeon Ian Paterson was published on 4 February 2020. It describes significant failures in the ability of the healthcare system to detect and protect patients from the consequences of Paterson’s malpractice.The report contains fifteen recommendations, some of which go to the heart of our regulatory system and the performance management of healthcare professionals. Government Ministers undertook to study these recommendations in detail and provide Parliament with a full response within a few months of the report’s publication or indeed within three months if that was appropriate.Our action to tackle the COVID-19 crisis has unfortunately diverted resources from this work which has had to be put on hold for the present time. This will inevitably lead to a delay in the Government’s formal, written response.I would like to assure Parliament and the public that we will resume our focus on the Government’s response as soon as these unprecedented circumstances are behind us. Also, that we remain committed to implementing considered and effective improvements in the areas set out in the Inquiry’s recommendations.In the meantime, we will continue to talk to NHS England and NHS Improvement and Spire Healthcare about the current and ongoing care of patients treated by Paterson.


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS208

Ministry of Justice

Final response to The Sentencing Code Volume I: Report (Law Com No. 382)

lord keen of elie: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Chris Philp) has made the following Written Statement."I am today announcing the Government’s final response to the Law Commission’s Report on the Sentencing Code, published on 22 November 2018. The final response can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-response-to-law-commission-report-on-the-sentencing-code. In May 2019 the Government issued an interim response which accepted the main recommendation of the Report to take forward the Sentencing Bill and the Sentencing (Pre-consolidation Amendments) Bill, and committed to consider its 11 secondary recommendations in further detail. Detailed responses to each of those recommendations are set out at the above link. The Government reiterates its thanks to the Law Commission for the enormous effort that has gone into producing the Report and accompanying legislation, and congratulates the Law Commission on an outstanding achievement."


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS210

Cabinet Office

Negotiations on the UK's future relationship with the EU: update

lord true: My Rt Hon. Friend, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Michael Gove) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:Negotiators from the UK and the EU held discussions through video conferencing on 20 – 24 April 2020 for the second round of negotiations on the UK-EU future relationship.Prior to the Round both sides shared legal texts, on the basis of which there were some clarificatory discussions in order to ensure that the Round was as well prepared as possible. The UK has shared the following texts: a full draft Free Trade Agreement, and separate draft Agreements on energy, law enforcement and criminal justice cooperation, air transport, air safety, civil nuclear, and social security coordination. In accordance with normal negotiating practice, the Government has not made these texts public, but keeps this issue under close review and would be ready to do so at a moment when it helped the negotiating dynamics.This was a full and constructive negotiating round, with both sides adapting positively to the new remote ways of working. The round was opened by the UK’s Chief Negotiator, David Frost, and by the European Commission’s Chief Negotiator, Michel Barnier, in a plenary session on 20 April. There were then discussions across all the issues and the session closed with a further plenary on 24 April.Discussions covered all workstreams including:Trade in Goods – market access and rules of origin, trade remedies, customs, technical barriers to trade and SPS.Trade in Services – Cross-border trade in services, investment, temporary entry for business purposes, professional qualifications, professional and business services, financial services and digital.Fisheries – discussion on control and enforcement, conservation and sustainable exploitation, and scientific evidence.Transport – Aviation and aviation safety, road haulage and passenger transport.Energy – Civil nuclear cooperation, gas and electricity trading, climate change and carbon pricing.Mobility and Social Security Coordination – including the UK’s legal text on social security coordination.Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice– UK presentation of the UK Law Enforcement Treaty with detailed discussions on operational capabilities.Thematic cooperation – Covering health security; asylum and illegal migration; cyber security; and security of information.Participation in Union Programmes - General terms for UK participation in programmes, including provisions for financial contribution.So called Level Playing Field - Including subsidies, competition policy, and trade and sustainable development.Horizontal Issues - Governance arrangements, territorial scope.Discussions showed that there was some promising convergence in the core areas of a Free Trade Agreement, but there remain some areas where we have significant differences of principle – notably fisheries, the so-called “level playing field”, and governance and dispute settlement. Progress in these areas will require the EU to engage with the political realities of the UK as an independent state.This Government remains committed to a deal with a Free Trade Agreement at its core. We look forward to negotiating constructively in the next Round beginning 11 May. 


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS209

Indemnity for Petition Officers at Recall Petitions

lord true: My Hon. Friend, the Minister of State for the Cabinet Office (Chloe Smith) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement:It is necessary for the Cabinet Office to indemnify petition officers in England, Scotland and Wales against uninsured claims that arise out of the conduct of their duties should a recall petition under section 1(1) of the Recall of MPs Act 2015 be triggered. This is because for the purposes of recall petitions, like returning officers and acting returning officers at elections, petition officers are independent officers. They are separate from both central and local government. As a result, they are exposed to a variety of legal risks varying from minor claims for injury at designated signing places, to significant recall petition complaints and associated legal costs.Insurance for specific elections has historically provided extremely poor value for money, with claims made under such cover being smaller than the cost of the insurance premium. An indemnity therefore provides better value for money and this approach has been taken for elections since 2009.It is normal practice, when a government department proposes to undertake a contingent liability in excess of £300,000 for which there is no specific statutory authority, for the Department concerned to present to Parliament a Minute giving particulars of the liability created and explaining the circumstances; and to refrain from incurring the liability until 14 parliamentary sitting days after the issue of the Minute, except in cases of special urgency.On this basis, I have today laid a Minute setting out the Cabinet Office’s intention to extend the current arrangements which indemnify petition officers for claims that arise out of the conduct of their duties in relation to the Recall of MPs Act 2015. This Act requires a recall petition to be held if one of the provisions under section 1 of the Act is met in relation to an MP. The responsibility for the conduct of the petition will rest with the petition officer for the constituency in which the petition is to be held. Section 6 of the Recall of MPs Act 2015 provides that every constituency is to have a petition officer for a recall petition and identifies who the petition officer is for each constituency: in England and Wales, it is the person who is the acting returning officer for UK Parliamentary elections for the relevant constituency; in Scotland it is the returning officer for UK Parliamentary elections for the relevant constituency. The petition officer is an independent entity, separate from both central and local government.On account of the House having agreed to rise early for the Easter recess and also to reduce the number of days for which it will sit each week, the current indemnity will expire before the full 14 sitting days are possible. Consequently, there will be a short period of time where Petition Officers will not be covered by an indemnity. However, this causes no problem in practice, because the Coronavirus Act 2020 makes provision for the deferral of the organisation of any recall petitions (on the basis that the Petition Officer no longer needs to open the recall petition on the 10th working day after receiving notification from the Speaker but instead needs to open the petition before 6 May 2021). So the course of action described in this Statement and the Minute protects Petition Officers appropriately, and ensures that the House is provided the full 14 sitting days to lodge any objections.We will also provide a certificate confirming that we will bear any employee liabilities of the returning officer which would otherwise be covered by insurance procured under the Employers' Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969.An indemnity was previously provided by the Home Office to returning officers for the 2012 Police and Crime Commissioner elections and the Cabinet Office regularly provides indemnities for UK Parliamentary elections. HM Treasury has approved the indemnity in principle. 


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS202

Treasury

Update on tax policy documents

lord agnew of oulton: My right honourable friend the Financial Secretary to the Tresaury (Jesse Norman) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement.At Budget 2020, the Government published eleven tax policy consultations and calls for evidence. The Government is grateful for the responses to these that have already been received from stakeholders.The Government recognises that many stakeholders are facing significant disruption due to COVID-19. The Government wants to give all stakeholders time to submit their views.Therefore, the deadlines for responses to the following tax policy documents will be extended for three months, to allow stakeholders to engage fully with these documents and to contribute to the tax policy making process. However, the Government encourages early responses from stakeholders where possible, to support its continuing consideration of these issues:Plastic Packaging Tax: Policy Design – now closing on 20 August 2020Preventing abuse of the R&D tax relief for SMEs: second consultation – now closing on 28 August 2020Tackling Construction Industry Scheme abuse – now closing on 28 August 2020Notification of uncertain tax treatment by large businesses – now closing on 27 August 2020Vehicle Excise Duty: call for evidence – now closing on 3 September 2020Call for evidence: raising standards in the tax market – now closing on 28 August 2020Consultation on the taxation impacts arising from the withdrawal of LIBOR – now closing on 28 August 2020Hybrid and other mismatches – now closing on 29 August 2020Tax treatment of asset holding companies in alternative fund structures – now closing on 19 August 2020Consultation: HMRC Charter – now closing on 15 August 2020The EU exit transition period will end on 31 December 2020. The consultation on duty-free and tax-free goods carried by passengers and the informal consultation on the VAT treatment of overseas goods will therefore continue to the existing timetable. This will provide businesses with clarity as early as possible on the policies that will apply from 1 January 2021. It will also give businesses enough time to prepare and ensure the right legislation is in place for 1 January 2021. The Government appreciates that some stakeholders may not be able to respond by the deadline, and where late submissions are received, it will take them into account as far as possible.On 16 April the Government published a consultation on the Climate Change Agreement scheme extension and reforms for any future scheme. The timetable for this will continue as planned, to ensure the extension of the scheme will be in place by September as announced at Budget 2020, supporting energy intensive businesses to operate in a more environmentally sustainable way.At Budget 2020, the Government also announced it would publish a number of other tax policy documents. In the light of COVID-19, the Government will consider the publication of these and other expected documents on a case by case basis, taking into account the impact of COVID-19 on stakeholders. The Government will continue to publish the following documents over the Spring and Summer:The call for evidence for the fundamental review of Business RatesThe consultation on further entitlement to use Red DieselThe consultation on the design of a carbon emissions taxThe consultation on National Insurance Contributions holiday for employers of veteransA call for evidence as part of the post-EU exit alcohol reviewA summary of responses to the call for evidence on the operation of Insurance Premium TaxA summary of responses and government next steps to the Aggregates Levy ReviewHMRC’s Civil information powersA summary of responses to the non-UK resident SDLT surcharge consultationA summary of responses to the call for evidence on VAT electronic sales suppressionA review of how VAT works in the public sectorThe Government will delay the publication of the following documents until the Autumn:A discussion document on the wider application of tax conditionalityThe response to the call for Evidence on simplification of the VAT partial exemption and capital goods schemesThe consultation on whether qualifying R&D tax credit costs should include investments in data and cloud computingThe consultation on stronger penalties for tobacco tax evasionThe Government will provide more detail on the publication of the following documents in due course:The consultation on aviation tax reformThe call for evidence on disguised remuneration schemesThe review of the UK funds regimeThe consultation on the Economic Crime LevyThe conclusion of the Small Brewers’ Relief ReviewA summary of responses to the call for evidence on Social Investment tax reliefThe Government’s position on publication of tax policy documents will be kept updated through the public consultations tracker.


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS211

Home Office

Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures (1 December 2019 to 29 February 2020)

baroness williams of trafford: My rt hon Friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department (Priti Patel) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:Section 19(1) of the Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011 (the Act) requires the Secretary of State to report to Parliament as soon as reasonably practicable after the end of every relevant three-month period on the exercise of her TPIM powers under the Act during that period. The level of information provided will always be subject to slight variations based on operational advice.  TPIM notices in force (as of 29 February 2020)5Number of new TPIM notices served (during this period)1TPIM notices in respect of British citizens (as of 29 February 2020)5TPIM notices extended (during the reporting period)0TPIM notices revoked (during the reporting period)1TPIM notices revived (during the reporting period)0Variations made to measures specified in TPIM notices (during the reporting period)2Applications to vary measures specified in TPIM notices refused (during the reporting period)3The number of subjects relocated under TPIM legislation (during this the reporting period)4   The TPIM Review Group (TRG) keeps every TPIM notice under regular and formal review. First quarter TRG meetings took place on 2, 3, 4, 11 and 12 March 2020. On 7 February 2020 an individual was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment after pleading guilty to twelve breaches of the financial services measure of a TPIM notice.


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS203

Council Decision on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Council of the International Civil Aviation Organization, in respect of the revision of Chapter 9 of Annex 9 (‘Facilitation’) to the Convention on International Civil Aviation with regard to standards and recommended practices on passenger name record data

baroness williams of trafford: My rt hon Friend the Minister of State for Security (James Brokenshire) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:The United Kingdom has left the European Union. Before doing so the Government decided not to opt-in to a Council Decision on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Council of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) in respect of the revision of Chapter 9 of Annex 9 (‘Facilitation’) to the Convention on International Civil Aviation with regard to the standards and recommended practices on Passenger Name Record data. The Council Decision cited a legal base in the Justice and Home Affairs section of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. As such the Government considered that, in line with the terms of Protocol (No. 21) to the Treaty, the United Kingdom’s opt-in decision applied. Adopted as Council Decision (EU) 2019/2107, the Council Decision records that the United Kingdom is bound by Directive (EU) 2016/681, on the use of passenger name record data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime, “and [is] therefore taking part in the adoption of [the] Decision”. The Government does not share this view. In accordance with the principle of sincere cooperation, the United Kingdom shall refrain, during the transition period, from any action or initiative likely to be prejudicial to the position taken by the Council Decision particularly within ICAO of which the United Kingdom is a contracting party in its own right.


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS204

Council Decision on the opening of negotiations for an Agreement between the European Union and Japan for the transfer and use of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data to prevent and combat terrorism and other serious transnational crime

baroness williams of trafford: My rt hon Friend the Minister of State for Security (James Brokenshire) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:The UK has left the European Union. Before doing so the Government decided not to opt-in to the Council Decision authorising the opening of negotiations with Japan on an Agreement for the transfer and use of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data. As the agreement to be negotiated will not apply to the UK it was inappropriate to opt-in to the proposed negotiating mandate. The UK’s exit from the EU means we can determine and pursue our own policy on the international transfer and use of PNR data, with Japan and other partners, which acknowledges the significance of this valuable and unique dataset for countering terrorism and serious crime subject to safeguards ensuring respect for individuals’ fundamental rights.


This statement has also been made in the House of Commons: 
HCWS205